It is apparent from archaeological sites that sub-Saharan peoples developed iron metallurgy independently. What would possibly lead historians to the conclusion that iron metallurgy was not a borrowed technology from the Southwest Asia?ResponsesThe remains are dated from successive time periods proving that the knowledge traveled from one region to another.The remains are dated from successive time periods proving that the knowledge traveled from one region to another.There were known trade routes through the Sudan that could have brought iron metallurgy to the region.There were known trade routes through the Sudan that could have brought iron metallurgy to the region.Early iron production sites in Africa are far beyond the Nile River valley and date to a period close to its adoption in Egypt.Early iron production sites in Africa are far beyond the Nile River valley and date to a period close to its adoption in Egypt.The amount of iron ore and the numbers of early sites indicate spread across sub-Saharan Africa by 500 B.C.E.The amount of iron ore and the numbers of early sites indicate spread across sub-Saharan Africa by 500 B.C.E.Since the Egyptians obtained iron technology from the Hittites, it must have spread from Egypt to Nubia and into the Bantu-speaking regions of Africa.

Then try StudyFetch, the AI-powered platform that can answer your questions and teach you more about it!