Historical evidence attests that some leaders continue fighting a war even after they realized that the war is going poorly. Which describes the leaders rationale behind this?1) fighting a war brings better outcome than negotiation.2) negotiation starts after the war brings unfavorable outcomes than before.3) declining states choose to fight because they prefer a costly war today to a efficient but disadvantageous peace tomorrow. 4) initiating a negotiation in the middle of a war reveals the information to the public that their countries are losing. Leaders do not want that revealed.5) Most leaders are not afraid of losing office even after they are initiating a losing war.

Then try StudyFetch, the AI-powered platform that can answer your questions and teach you more about it!