Consider the following argument for using terrorism: "deliberately killing non-innocents for political or ideological reasons may be morally permissible. Noncombatant citizens of an enemy nation depend on that nation and contribute to it and therefore they share some blame for the nations hostile actions. Therefore they are not innocent and therefore it may be morally permissible for the nations enemies to attack those noncombatants." What common principle does this argument go against

Then try StudyFetch, the AI-powered platform that can answer your questions and teach you more about it!